changelog
- Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:37:40 -0500
- by brett [Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:37:40 -0500] rev 34
- [svn] Add support for LZMA compression. Holy crap that was easy.
- Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:24:04 -0500
- by brett [Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:24:04 -0500] rev 33
- [svn] Fix some bugs and make things a little more user-friendly now that we can
try multiple extractors per file. Add some logging as part of this. I'm
probably still not done -- heck, dtrx has never really been user-friendly
enough -- but at least now it's not ridiculous.
- Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:21:34 -0500
- by brett [Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:21:34 -0500] rev 32
- [svn] Oops, finish adding 7z support.
- Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:20:39 -0500
- by brett [Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:20:39 -0500] rev 31
- [svn] Refactor actions (extract the archive, vs. list the contents) into their
own classes, instead of having all that in the Application class. Also did
some similar fidgeting with the ExtractorBuilder. I like this better.
It's still not the cleanest API but things feel more manageable now.
Add 7z support.
- Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:06:53 -0400
- by brett [Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:06:53 -0400] rev 30
- [svn] If we can't figure out what the file is by mimetype, try using the file
command to figure out what it is instead.
This completely changes the program structure because now we might try to
use several extractors on a particular file before giving up. I haven't
really done the refactoring that would be appropriate for a change this
fundamental. I'd like to do that before the next release.
- Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:03:17 -0400
- by brett [Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:03:17 -0400] rev 29
- [svn] Add support for Ruby Gems, and extracting metadata from .deb/.gem files.
- Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:46:20 -0400
- by brett [Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:46:20 -0400] rev 28
- [svn] Change all the license notices from GPLv2 to GPLv3.
Instead of checking the archive contents, figuring out what to do, and
doing it, instead we now always extract the archive to a private directory,
and then shuffle around the contents appropriately. I expected this to be
a bigger win than my benchmarks have borne out, but I'm sticking with this
strategy because it provides a cleaner separation of responsibilities
between the extractors and the archive type handlers, and also I have to
believe it's a much better way to handle bigger archives -- since we're now
reading it once and not twice.